Corvus Insurance cyber policy application, held
The questions of the Corvus Smart Cyber Application, held and mapped to the ISO 27001:2022 controls, the SOC 2 criteria and the NIST CSF 2.0 outcomes each one reaches. The source document (read 2026-10-11). The date shown is the date this copy was read, not a version the form itself states. This page quotes only the question each mapped row needs and states its source; it does not publish the carrier's form. A complete form would be held only under a stated policy for copyrighted forms. Corvus Insurance is a source document, never a customer.
This document's questions reach 59 of 290 held controls. Whether an applicant is offered cover is the carrier’s underwriting decision. 3 questions here are flagged knockout (a "no" is a common decline point) and 0 flagged warranty (an answer the carrier relies on, that can affect cover if wrong).
Application question Are there any subsidiaries for which the Named Insured wishes to cover under the policy?
This is a scoping question, not a control requirement. It reaches no held control.
No held control answers this line.
Application question Does the Applicant collect, capture, purchase, receive through trade, or otherwise obtain biometric data (biometric data is data related to body measurements and calculations related to human characteristics and includes, but is not limited to, fingerprints, iris or retina scans, voiceprints, sleep/health/exercise data, DNA or biological markers?
ISO 27001:2022 A.5.34 Privacy and protection of personal identifiable information (PII)
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- The topic-specific privacy and PII protection policy and its communication to relevant parties
- Privacy procedures communicated to everyone who processes PII
ISO 27001:2022 A.5.31 Legal, statutory, regulatory and contractual requirements
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- A register of applicable laws, regulations and contractual obligations for information security, with the countries covered, the approach to meeting each and a named responsible owner
- Records of periodic review of the register and of new or changed legislation identified
SOC 2 P1.1 Privacy notice to data subjects
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Published privacy notice with effective date and version history
- Evidence notice is presented at collection points (forms, apps)
SOC 2 P3.1 Collecting personal information consistent with objectives
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Data inventory showing purpose for each personal data field
- Privacy review of new collection forms or features
NIST CSF 2.0 GV.OC-03 Legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements regarding cybersecurity - including privacy and civil liberties obligations - are understood and managed
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Legal and regulatory obligations register with owners
- Contractual security clauses summary across customer base
NIST CSF 2.0 PR.DS-01 The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Data at rest encryption inventory by store type
- Storage configuration baselines with attestation
Application question Do you have email filtering in place?
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.23 Web filtering
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Current rules on safe, proper use of online resources
- Web filtering or secure web gateway configuration showing blocked categories such as malicious, phishing, command and control, illegal content and upload sites
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.7 Protection against malware
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Anti-malware deployment and update status reports across endpoints, servers and gateways
- Application allowlisting and malicious website blocking configurations
ISO 27001:2022 A.5.14 Information transfer
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- The topic-specific information transfer policy and its communication record
- Transfer agreements with third parties covering recipient authentication, protection levels, incident liability and labelling
SOC 2 CC6.8 Preventing and detecting unauthorised or malicious software
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Endpoint protection coverage report across servers and workstations
- Local administrator and software installation restrictions
NIST CSF 2.0 PR.PS-05 Installation and execution of unauthorized software are prevented
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Application allowlist policy and tooling configuration
- Endpoint protection deployment reports
Application question Do you have a backup solution?
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.13 Information backup
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- The topic-specific backup policy and backup plans stating scope, extent, frequency and retention per system aligned with RPO
- Backup job monitoring reports with evidence that failed jobs were investigated and rerun
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.14 Redundancy of information processing facilities
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Documented availability requirements for business services and systems
- Architecture diagrams showing redundancy such as dual providers, redundant networks, separate data centres, redundant power and load-balanced instances
SOC 2 A1.2 Environmental protection, backup and recovery infrastructure
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Backup policy defining scope, frequency and retention
- Backup job monitoring and failure remediation records
SOC 2 A1.3 Testing recovery plan procedures
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Disaster recovery or continuity test plan and results in the period
- Backup restore test records with verification of completeness
NIST CSF 2.0 PR.DS-11 Backups of data are created, protected, maintained, and tested
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Backup policy with frequency and retention
- Backup integrity test reports
Application question If "Yes", how frequently do you back up systems and data?
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.13 Information backup
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- The topic-specific backup policy and backup plans stating scope, extent, frequency and retention per system aligned with RPO
- Backup job monitoring reports with evidence that failed jobs were investigated and rerun
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.14 Redundancy of information processing facilities
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Documented availability requirements for business services and systems
- Architecture diagrams showing redundancy such as dual providers, redundant networks, separate data centres, redundant power and load-balanced instances
SOC 2 A1.2 Environmental protection, backup and recovery infrastructure
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Backup policy defining scope, frequency and retention
- Backup job monitoring and failure remediation records
SOC 2 A1.3 Testing recovery plan procedures
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Disaster recovery or continuity test plan and results in the period
- Backup restore test records with verification of completeness
NIST CSF 2.0 PR.DS-11 Backups of data are created, protected, maintained, and tested
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Backup policy with frequency and retention
- Backup integrity test reports
Application question Which of the following are in place for your backup solution(s?
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.13 Information backup
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- The topic-specific backup policy and backup plans stating scope, extent, frequency and retention per system aligned with RPO
- Backup job monitoring reports with evidence that failed jobs were investigated and rerun
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.14 Redundancy of information processing facilities
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Documented availability requirements for business services and systems
- Architecture diagrams showing redundancy such as dual providers, redundant networks, separate data centres, redundant power and load-balanced instances
SOC 2 A1.2 Environmental protection, backup and recovery infrastructure
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Backup policy defining scope, frequency and retention
- Backup job monitoring and failure remediation records
SOC 2 A1.3 Testing recovery plan procedures
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Disaster recovery or continuity test plan and results in the period
- Backup restore test records with verification of completeness
NIST CSF 2.0 PR.DS-11 Backups of data are created, protected, maintained, and tested
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Backup policy with frequency and retention
- Backup integrity test reports
Application question Which of the of the following apply to your Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) implementation?
Flagged knockout: the wording of this question makes a "no" a common point at which a cyber application is declined or referred.
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.5 Secure authentication
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- An authentication standard linking required authentication strength to information classification and system criticality
- MFA configuration and coverage reports for critical systems, remote access and privileged access, including conditional or risk-based rules
ISO 27001:2022 A.5.17 Authentication information
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Credential issuance procedure requiring identity verification before new, replacement or temporary credentials are provided
- Evidence that initial credentials are unique, delivered over protected channels and changed at first use
SOC 2 CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Asset inventory with classification for in-scope systems
- Identity provider configuration showing MFA and password policy
NIST CSF 2.0 PR.AA-03 Users, services, and hardware are authenticated
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Multi factor authentication coverage report
- Phishing resistant authentication rollout plan
Application question How are privileged accounts secured and managed?
Flagged knockout: the wording of this question makes a "no" a common point at which a cyber application is declined or referred.
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.2 Privileged access rights
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- An inventory of privileged accounts per system (operating systems, databases, applications, cloud consoles) mapped to named individuals
- Authorization records for each privileged grant with approver, justification and expiry
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.3 Information access restriction
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- System, application and cloud storage configurations restricting access by identity or group, with granular permissions per action
- Evidence that anonymous or public access is limited to locations holding no sensitive information, for example storage bucket access reviews
ISO 27001:2022 A.5.15 Access control
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- The topic-specific access control policy, approved and communicated, reflecting owner-defined business and security requirements
- Access control rules or role models mapping entities (users, services, devices) to rights, consistent with classification
SOC 2 CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- the bank or treasury platform dual-authorisation setup and the payment approval workflow, showing a second approver on a different device above the threshold
- the callback or out-of-band verification procedure for a change to payee bank details, with a dated example
SOC 2 CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Asset inventory with classification for in-scope systems
- Identity provider configuration showing MFA and password policy
NIST CSF 2.0 PR.AA-05 Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Access policy framework with role definitions
- Privileged access management deployment evidence
Application question What Endpoint Security Technology do you have in place?
Flagged knockout: the wording of this question makes a "no" a common point at which a cyber application is declined or referred.
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.7 Protection against malware
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Anti-malware deployment and update status reports across endpoints, servers and gateways
- Application allowlisting and malicious website blocking configurations
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.1 User end point devices
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- The topic-specific endpoint policy covering classification limits, registration, software restrictions, updates, network connection rules, encryption, malware protection, remote wipe, backup and port control
- Device management (MDM or endpoint management) reports showing enrolment, encryption, patch level, firewall and anti-malware status
SOC 2 CC6.8 Preventing and detecting unauthorised or malicious software
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Endpoint protection coverage report across servers and workstations
- Local administrator and software installation restrictions
NIST CSF 2.0 PR.PS-05 Installation and execution of unauthorized software are prevented
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Application allowlist policy and tooling configuration
- Endpoint protection deployment reports
NIST CSF 2.0 DE.CM-09 Computing hardware and software, runtime environments, and their data are monitored to find potentially adverse events
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- EDR coverage report by asset class
- File integrity monitoring baseline and drift alerts
Application question What security controls are in place to protect against unauthorized access to sensitive and confidential data?
ISO 27001:2022 A.5.12 Classification of information
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- The topic-specific classification policy with named levels, criteria based on impact, and conventions covering confidentiality, integrity and availability
- Evidence the scheme was communicated to relevant interested parties and built into procedures
ISO 27001:2022 A.5.15 Access control
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- The topic-specific access control policy, approved and communicated, reflecting owner-defined business and security requirements
- Access control rules or role models mapping entities (users, services, devices) to rights, consistent with classification
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.24 Use of cryptography
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- The topic-specific cryptography policy with approved algorithms, key lengths, protocols and usage by information classification
- Evidence of encryption on endpoints, removable media and data in transit, aligned with the policy
SOC 2 CC6.1 Logical access security over protected information assets
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Asset inventory with classification for in-scope systems
- Identity provider configuration showing MFA and password policy
SOC 2 CC6.2 Registering and authorising users before issuing credentials
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Access request tickets with owner approval for a sample of new users, service accounts and API credentials
- Termination records reconciled to account disablement dates
NIST CSF 2.0 PR.DS-01 The confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data-at-rest are protected
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Data at rest encryption inventory by store type
- Storage configuration baselines with attestation
NIST CSF 2.0 PR.AA-01 Identities and credentials for authorized users, services, and hardware are managed by the organization
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Identity management platform configuration baseline
- Joiner mover leaver workflow with timing SLAs
Application question Do you have a Business Continuity Plan (BCP) or Disaster Recovery Plan (DRP) in place?
ISO 27001:2022 A.5.29 Information security during disruption
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Business continuity plans that contain information security requirements and the controls, systems and tools needed during disruption
- A documented analysis of which security controls must be adapted during disruption and how
ISO 27001:2022 A.5.30 ICT readiness for business continuity
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- The business impact analysis with prioritized activities, supporting ICT services and their RTOs, and RPOs for required information
- Selected ICT continuity strategies covering before, during and after disruption
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.14 Redundancy of information processing facilities
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Documented availability requirements for business services and systems
- Architecture diagrams showing redundancy such as dual providers, redundant networks, separate data centres, redundant power and load-balanced instances
SOC 2 CC9.1 Mitigating risks of business disruption
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Business continuity and disaster recovery plans covering the in-scope service
- Business impact analysis
SOC 2 A1.2 Environmental protection, backup and recovery infrastructure
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Backup policy defining scope, frequency and retention
- Backup job monitoring and failure remediation records
NIST CSF 2.0 PR.IR-03 Mechanisms are implemented to achieve resilience requirements in normal and adverse situations
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Resilience architecture patterns for critical services
- Failover and failback tested with evidence
NIST CSF 2.0 RC.RP-01 The recovery portion of the incident response plan is executed once initiated from the incident response process
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Recovery plan with triggers and decision rights
- Execution log of recovery activities
Application question If yes, has it been tested in the last 12 months?
This is a loss history question, not a control requirement. It reaches no held control.
No held control answers this line.
Application question Do you have an Intrusion Detection System (IDS) or Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) in place?
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.15 Logging
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- The topic-specific logging policy defining purposes, events to be logged, fields captured, retention and protection
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.16 Monitoring activities
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- A documented monitoring scope covering network traffic, system access, configuration files, security tool logs, code integrity and resource use, with retention periods
- Baselines of normal behaviour for systems and user groups, and the detection rules built on them
SOC 2 CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Hardening standards or benchmarks for in-scope platforms
- Configuration compliance scan results
SOC 2 CC7.2 Monitoring system components for anomalies
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Alert rules and sample of triaged alerts
- Threat intelligence sources in use
NIST CSF 2.0 DE.CM-01 Networks and network services are monitored to find potentially adverse events
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Network flow telemetry coverage map by segment
- IDS or NDR sensor inventory with placement diagram
NIST CSF 2.0 PR.PS-04 Log records are generated and made available for continuous monitoring
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Logging policy by data class and system tier
- Centralized log collection architecture
Application question Do you conduct penetration testing of your network at least annually?
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.8 Management of technical vulnerabilities
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- A software asset inventory with vendor, product, version, deployment location and responsible owner
- Defined vulnerability management roles and a list of monitored vulnerability information sources
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.19 Installation of software on operational systems
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Procedures for installing and updating operational software, including authorization, testing and rollback planning
- Change and deployment records showing management authorization, successful testing and the administrator who performed the installation
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.29 Security testing in development and acceptance
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Security test plans with schedules, inputs, expected outputs, evaluation criteria and decisions, scaled to the system's importance and change impact
- Security test results covering authentication, access restriction, cryptography, secure coding and configuration
SOC 2 CC7.1 Detecting configuration changes and new vulnerabilities
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Hardening standards or benchmarks for in-scope platforms
- Configuration compliance scan results
NIST CSF 2.0 ID.RA-01 Vulnerabilities in assets are identified, validated, and recorded
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Vulnerability scanning coverage report
- Vulnerability triage workflow with severity SLAs
NIST CSF 2.0 PR.PS-02 Software is maintained, replaced, and removed commensurate with risk
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Software lifecycle policy with end of support tracking
- Patch management cadence and exception register
Application question Do you conduct employee security training or phishing training, for all employees, at least annually?
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.23 Web filtering
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Current rules on safe, proper use of online resources
- Web filtering or secure web gateway configuration showing blocked categories such as malicious, phishing, command and control, illegal content and upload sites
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.7 Protection against malware
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Anti-malware deployment and update status reports across endpoints, servers and gateways
- Application allowlisting and malicious website blocking configurations
ISO 27001:2022 A.5.14 Information transfer
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- The topic-specific information transfer policy and its communication record
- Transfer agreements with third parties covering recipient authentication, protection levels, incident liability and labelling
SOC 2 CC6.8 Preventing and detecting unauthorised or malicious software
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Endpoint protection coverage report across servers and workstations
- Local administrator and software installation restrictions
SOC 2 CC1.4 Attracting, developing and retaining competent people (COSO principle 4)
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Background check policy and completed checks for a sample of new hires and contractors
- Role competency requirements and performance review records
NIST CSF 2.0 PR.PS-05 Installation and execution of unauthorized software are prevented
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Application allowlist policy and tooling configuration
- Endpoint protection deployment reports
NIST CSF 2.0 PR.AT-01 Personnel are provided with awareness and training so that they possess the knowledge and skills to perform general tasks with cybersecurity risks in mind
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Security awareness program curriculum
- Completion records by population
Application question Prior to executing an electronic payment, do you verify the validity of the funds transfer request or payment change request, with the requestor, via a separate means of communication prior to transferring funds or making payment changes?
ISO 27001:2022 A.5.3 Segregation of duties
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- the bank or treasury platform dual-authorisation setup and the payment approval workflow, showing a second approver on a different device above the threshold
- the callback or out-of-band verification procedure for a change to payee bank details, with a dated example
ISO 27001:2022 A.6.3 Information security awareness, education and training
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- A documented awareness, education and training programme aligned with the policies and planned by role, including external personnel
- Completion records for initial training of new starters and role changers and for periodic refreshers
ISO 27001:2022 A.8.5 Secure authentication
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- An authentication standard linking required authentication strength to information classification and system criticality
- MFA configuration and coverage reports for critical systems, remote access and privileged access, including conditional or risk-based rules
SOC 2 CC6.3 Role-based access, least privilege and segregation of duties
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- the bank or treasury platform dual-authorisation setup and the payment approval workflow, showing a second approver on a different device above the threshold
- the callback or out-of-band verification procedure for a change to payee bank details, with a dated example
SOC 2 CC3.3 Considering fraud risk (COSO principle 8)
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Fraud risk assessment or fraud section of the enterprise risk assessment
- Analysis of privileged access and data misuse scenarios
NIST CSF 2.0 PR.AA-05 Access permissions, entitlements, and authorizations are defined in a policy, managed, enforced, and reviewed, and incorporate the principles of least privilege and separation of duties
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Access policy framework with role definitions
- Privileged access management deployment evidence
Application question If the Applicant uses multimedia material provided by others, does the Applicant always obtain the necessary rights, licenses, releases, and consents prior to publishing?
This is a media liability question, not a control requirement. It reaches no held control.
No held control answers this line.
Application question If the Applicant accepts payment cards in exchange for goods or services rendered, is the Applicant or their outsourced payment processor PCI compliant?
ISO 27001:2022 A.5.19 Information security in supplier relationships
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- The topic-specific supplier relationship policy and its communication record
- A supplier inventory categorized by type and by the information, services and infrastructure each can access
ISO 27001:2022 A.5.20 Addressing information security within supplier agreements
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Supplier agreements containing security clauses proportionate to the relationship, such as classification mapping, agreed controls, incident notification, subcontracting, right to audit and termination terms
- A register of contracts, memoranda and information-sharing arrangements with outside parties showing what information each covers and when it was last reviewed
ISO 27001:2022 A.5.21 Managing information security in the information and communication technology (ICT) supply chain
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Security requirements included in ICT acquisition specifications and contracts, including flow-down to sub-suppliers
- Software component information such as SBOMs and descriptions of security functions and secure configuration obtained from product suppliers
SOC 2 CC9.2 Assessing and managing vendor and business partner risk
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Vendor inventory with risk tiers and the review frequency set for each tier
- Due diligence records, for example vendor SOC reports reviewed with complementary controls noted
SOC 2 P6.4 Privacy commitments from vendors and third parties
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Data processing agreements with privacy clauses
- Periodic assessments of vendors' privacy compliance
NIST CSF 2.0 GV.SC-01 A cybersecurity supply chain risk management program, strategy, objectives, policies, and processes are established and agreed to by organizational stakeholders
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Third party risk management program charter
- Supplier risk policy with tiering criteria
NIST CSF 2.0 GV.SC-05 Requirements to address cybersecurity risks in supply chains are established, prioritized, and integrated into contracts and other types of agreements with suppliers and other relevant third parties
Evidence to have on file (guidance, our wording)
- Standard supplier security requirements catalog
- Contract clause library with cyber obligations
Application question In the past three years, have you experienced any cyber security incident, data privacy incident or any multimedia liability claim?
This is a loss history question, not a control requirement. It reaches no held control.
No held control answers this line.
Application question Do you or any other person or organization proposed for this insurance have knowledge of any actual or alleged: security breach, privacy breach, privacy-related event or incident, breach of privacy, or multimedia incident that may reasonably be expected to give rise to a claim or to costs being incurred?
Prior-knowledge question. This asks whether the applicant knows of any circumstance that could give rise to a claim. A wrong answer here is the classic route to a prior-knowledge exclusion or rescission, so it is the highest-consequence line on the form, not a line to leave unread. It reaches no control by itself: it is about what the applicant knows, not a control to hold.
No held control answers this line.
Application question In the past 3 years, have you or any other organization proposed for this insurance sustained any unscheduled network outage or interruption lasting longer than 6 hours?
This is a loss history question, not a control requirement. It reaches no held control.
No held control answers this line.
Controls not asked in this held document (231)
None of this held document's questions reach 231 of the 290 held controls (for example A.5.1, A.5.2, A.5.4, A.5.5, A.5.6, A.5.7, A.5.8, A.5.9). That is a fact about this held document, not about what the carrier underwrites on: a carrier's fuller forms and supplements ask controls this summary does not, multi-factor authentication, offline backups and patching among them. A control here is not asserted as required, and not asserted as not required.